Save
Hydrodissection of the retro-pubic space with infiltration prior to retro-pubic mid-urethral tension free tape insertion
IUGA Academy. Tailor V. Jun 30, 2018; 213049
Topic: Stress Incontinence
Visha Tailor
Visha Tailor

Access to Premium content is currently a membership benefit.


Click here to join IUGA or renew your membership.

Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)

535

Hydrodissection of the retro-pubic space with infiltration prior to retro-pubic mid-urethral tension free tape insertion

Tailor, V1

1: Imperial College NHS Trust

Introduction: Retro-pubic mid-urethral tension free tape (TVT) placement to successfully treat stress urinary incontinence was first described by Ulmsten in 1995. The procedure describes retropubic infiltration of the cave of Retzius before passing a trocar, to guide needles of the tape retropubically through a mid-urethral vaginal incision. Commercial kits have been developed to facilitate the technique and provide subjective long term cure rates of 51% – 88% using a ‘bottom to top’ approach. The procedure has a 4.5% risk of bladder injury, and <1% risk of bladder mesh erosion. TVT can be carried out with or without retropubic infiltration to allow hydrodissection of the bladder away from the pubic bone. This step is recommended by some manufacturers to facilitate correct placement of the trocars and reduce the risk of bladder injury. The use of local anesthetic with combined adrenaline may provide additional analgesia. No previous studies have measured the effect of hydrodissection to the retro-pubic space.

Objective: To measure the space between the pubic symphysis and bladder wall before and after hydrodissection to the retro-pubic space prior to TVT trocar placement using abdominal ultrasound.

Methods: TVT using Gynecare TVT (Ethicon) was carried out for 41 patients. Following general anesthesia, abdominal ultrasound using a 2D 5mHz probe was performed to measure the space between the pubic symphysis and the bladder. Hydrodissection was carried out using a total of 120mls of normal saline. 80ml was injected suprapubically to the skin and retro-pubic space on the right and left of the midline using a spinal needle. A further 20ml was infiltrated vaginally on each side of the urethra up to the urogenital diaphragm. Abdominal ultrasound was repeated, measuring the widest space in a sagittal plane between the pubic symphysis and the bladder, before proceeding with trocar and tape insertion.

Results: The average retro-pubic space measurement was 0mm prior to hydrodissection. Only one patient had a 1.6mm space pre-infiltration. Following infiltration as described, a statistically significant (p<0.00001, Mann Whitney U test) increase in the retropubic space with a mean of 6.7mm [range 3.1mm – 9.9mm] was created with hydrodissection. No intra-operative bladder injury occurred in this group of patients.

Conclusions: This study provides ultrasound evidence of a space produced by hydrodissection that can facilitate trocar passage. Trocars for tape insertion vary in width from 2.7mm to 5mm, this space was generated in 100% to 70% of patients respectively. This suggests that hydrodissection may reduce bladder injury during the insertion of retropubic mid urethral tapes.

Disclosure:

Work supported by industry: no.

Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.


Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.



Google Analytics is used for user behavior tracking/reporting. Google Analytics works in parallel and independently from MLG’s features. Google Analytics relies on cookies and these cookies can be used by Google to track users across different platforms/services.


Save Settings