Standardized apical fixation - laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament replacement: defined material of defined shape at defined fixation sites
IUGA Academy. Ludwig S. Jun 30, 2018; 213280; 236
Dr. Sebastian Ludwig
Dr. Sebastian Ludwig

Access to Premium content is currently a membership benefit.


Click here to join IUGA or renew your membership.

Abstract
Discussion Forum (0)
Rate & Comment (0)

236

'Standardized' apical fixation - laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament replacement: defined material of defined shape at defined fixation sites

Ludwig, S1; Jäger, W1; Mallmann, P1

1: University of Cologne

Introduction: In contrast to the established gold-standard (sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous fixation) for apical fixation, the so called cervicosacropexy and vaginosacropexy (LACESA and LAVASA) are clearly defined surgical procedures and restore urinary continence. The uterosacral ligaments (USL) are replaced bilaterally with a minimum of material between the cervix / vaginal vault and the sacral vertebra at the level of S1. Since the bony dimensions in the female small pelvis are nearly identical alloplastic tapes of defined lengths (9cm) and shape (width 0.4cm) were used to replace the USL. Therefore, the results are comparable and can be performed identically by different surgeons.

Objective: The objective of this study was the implementation of a laparoscopic apical fixation in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Methods: In LACESA, subtotal hysterectomy was performed by dissecting the uterus above the origin of the USL at the cervix. In LAVASA, the peritoneum over the vaginal vault was opened along the running scar. The polyvinylidene-fluoride (PVDF) ligament-replacement structure was sutured to the cervix or vaginal vault. The peritoneum over the first sacral vertebra (attachment of the USL) was blunt-opened and the USLs were “tunneld” towards cervix/vault on both sides and the PVDF-structure was placed into the peritoneal fold. The PVDF ligament-replacement structure was attached with three titanium helices to the prevertebral fascia of S1 on each side. The peritoneum above the cervix or vaginal vault was closed.

Urinary incontinence symptoms were documented according to validated questionnaires, objective outcome according to POP-Q system.

Results: So far, 160 patients underwent LACESA and LAVASA. Median operating time was 89 minutes (32-194min). At 4 months, in 76% and 100% of patients urinary continence and apical prolapse were restored. No mesh erosion appeared.

Conclusions: The CESA and VASA surgical techniques are techniques to restore apical vaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence as already described. LACESA and LAVASA with fixation at physiological landmarks with a minimum of material contributes to the established surgical treatment options for genital prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Disclosure:

Work supported by industry: no.

Code of conduct/disclaimer available in General Terms & Conditions

By clicking “Accept Terms & all Cookies” or by continuing to browse, you agree to the storing of third-party cookies on your device to enhance your user experience and agree to the user terms and conditions of this learning management system (LMS).

Cookie Settings
Accept Terms & all Cookies